Boer Volkstaat 10.31.16 Theses Briefing Paper: Executive Overview:
“An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it.” -– Mahatma Gandhi “We believe as much in the purity of race as we think they do, only we believe that they would best serve these interests, which are as dear to us as to them, by advocating the purity of all races, and not one alone.” - Mahatma Gandhi, Indian Opinion, 24 September 1903 “A man must first of all understand certain things. He has thousands of false ideas and false conceptions, chiefly about himself, and he must get rid of some of them before beginning to acquire anything new. Otherwise the new will be built on a wrong foundation and the result will be worse than before. To speak the truth is the most difficult thing in the world; one must study a great deal and for a long time in order to speak the truth. The wish alone is not enough. To speak the truth one must know what the truth is and what a lie is, and first of all in oneself. And this nobody wants to know.” -- G.I. Gurdjieff |
The purpose of this Boer Volkstaat 10/31/16 Theses Petition and Briefing Paper argument is that: [A] International and EU Political Recognition for VVK negotiations for a Boer Volkstaat in South Africa; or in the absence thereof [B] Jus Sanguinis Right of Return legislation by relevant EU nations, for their African White Refugee descendants, is fully justified as a result of: (I) International Law, (II) S. 235 of the SA Constitution and the Accord on Afrikaner Self-Determination, signed on 23 April 1994 between Freedom Front, African National Congress & SA Government; (III) African National Congress (ANC) and Anti-Apartheid Movement (AAM) Truth and Reconciliation (TRC) Fraud; and (IV) Population Policy Friction Theory Common Sense: The Peak Oil GeoPoLegal Military Necessity of Ethno-Cultural Secession and Economic Relocalisation. Put differently: the geopolitical, national, ethnic and cultural importance of amicably resolving the multi-cultural conflicts to occur as a result of population pressures colliding with declining resources, prior to their friction theory on steroids aggravation by the socio-political and economic friction theory resource war consequences of Peak Oil.
Limitations of space and concern for the readers patience do not provide the opportunity for this Petition and Briefing Paper to discuss every evidentiary argument and its political and legal nuance in support of the ‘TRC fraud’ thesis. Instead we focus on a few glaringly obvious ‘In Your Face’ Politically Incorrect TRC fraud Inconvenient Truths. These TRC Fraud Inconvenient Truths are deliberately ignored or censored by the Proudly South African Rainbow Hypocrisy worshipping academia and media, formerly known as the ‘Anti-Apartheid Movement’; or if you prefer democratic socialist publication Searchlight South Africa’s description of the Anti-Apartheid Movement: “the most successful Popular Front Lobby for Stalinism anywhere in the world.”
Limitations of space and concern for the readers patience do not provide the opportunity for this Petition and Briefing Paper to discuss every evidentiary argument and its political and legal nuance in support of the ‘TRC fraud’ thesis. Instead we focus on a few glaringly obvious ‘In Your Face’ Politically Incorrect TRC fraud Inconvenient Truths. These TRC Fraud Inconvenient Truths are deliberately ignored or censored by the Proudly South African Rainbow Hypocrisy worshipping academia and media, formerly known as the ‘Anti-Apartheid Movement’; or if you prefer democratic socialist publication Searchlight South Africa’s description of the Anti-Apartheid Movement: “the most successful Popular Front Lobby for Stalinism anywhere in the world.”
[TRC Fraud: Just War Tradition] [TRC Fraud: Clash of Cultures Friction Theory]
[TRC Fraud: Population Policy Common Sense] [Volkstaat Secession or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return]
[TRC Fraud: Population Policy Common Sense] [Volkstaat Secession or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return]
TRC Fraud: Clash of Cultures Friction Theory:
1. Pandora’s Multi-Culti Apartheid Box: SA’s Multi-Cultural, Multi-Lingual, Multi-Racial Integration Nightmare:
Mike Smith’s Opening Pandora’s Apartheid Box: Rationales for Apartheid series provides a detailed account of the political, cultural, religious and other motivations and causes for the establishment of apartheid.
In Chapter 2: What does ‘Diversity’ mean in South Africa he provides an overview of SA’s huge diversity of languages, cultures, and ethnicities, detailing the absolute integration nightmare, and how the policy of Apartheid was in fact the fairest system of government, considering South Africa’s multicultural and ethnic realities.
In Chapter 2: What does ‘Diversity’ mean in South Africa he provides an overview of SA’s huge diversity of languages, cultures, and ethnicities, detailing the absolute integration nightmare, and how the policy of Apartheid was in fact the fairest system of government, considering South Africa’s multicultural and ethnic realities.
2. Western Descartian Individualist ‘I Think, Therefore I Am” vs. African Ubuntu Conformist “I Participate, therefore I Am’:
Few westerners realize that the African concept of Ubuntu is founded on existential identity foundations which are totally opposite to European Descartian existential identity foundations. In the Descartian “I Think, Therefore I am” westernized existential paradigm an individual’s sense of identity is – or should be -- a result of his ‘thinking’. In the Ubuntu “I participate, therefore I am” African existential paradigm the individual’s identity is not a result of his own critical thinking faculties and powers, or lack of them.
The Ubuntu African’ sense of identity is a result of his willingness to conform to peer pressure, to be accepted to participate in the tribe. The Ubuntu African is not encouraged to increase his own self-esteem and certainty in his sense of identity by increasing the power of his critical thinking faculties. The Ubuntu African is not encouraged to increase his personal meta-cognitive critical thinking conscience to improve the quality of his character, to ‘know himself’, and hence his knowledge of right and wrong, in accordance with his principles and values.
The Ubuntu African’s sense of identity and self-esteem is a result of his community’s acceptance of his willingness to conform to their demands and their values. Themba Sono refers to the result of this Ubuntu African paradigm as the “constrictive nature” or “tyrannical custom” of a derailed African culture, especially its “totalitarian communalism”. The Ubuntu African’s existential psychology is focused on belief, not reason. Rationality is overwhelmed by emotional identity to belong, and to conform, in order to improve the individual’s sense of self-worth, which is measured by his participation, not critical thinking.
The Descartian Western and Ubuntu African existential values which determine the individuals foundation for their sense of identity, purpose and meaning, are not slightly different; but opposing. If only slightly different, they could be compatible for a peaceful multi-cultural society. They are however in direct opposition to another; which means they are and will forever be in conflict with another; for supremacy. They are incompatible for a peaceful multi-cultural society. The former is capable of tolerating the latter, as it does for its less meta-cognitively aware cultural members; but the latter’s sense of personal identity shall continually be assaulted for not being ‘included’, aggravating his psychological insecurity. The psychologically insecure Ubuntu African’s response will be political and social coercion to ‘include’ to coerce society to ‘accept’ Africans ‘participation’, irrespective of their skills or competency to participate in any given skill, task or event.
The clash of these worldviews are further exacerbated in South Africa by a legal and political elite which pretend these existential identity differences don’t exist, in favour of manipulating the ignorant poverty stricken vote farm’s confusion, with apartheid blame game tactics for their own political gain.
The Ubuntu African’ sense of identity is a result of his willingness to conform to peer pressure, to be accepted to participate in the tribe. The Ubuntu African is not encouraged to increase his own self-esteem and certainty in his sense of identity by increasing the power of his critical thinking faculties. The Ubuntu African is not encouraged to increase his personal meta-cognitive critical thinking conscience to improve the quality of his character, to ‘know himself’, and hence his knowledge of right and wrong, in accordance with his principles and values.
The Ubuntu African’s sense of identity and self-esteem is a result of his community’s acceptance of his willingness to conform to their demands and their values. Themba Sono refers to the result of this Ubuntu African paradigm as the “constrictive nature” or “tyrannical custom” of a derailed African culture, especially its “totalitarian communalism”. The Ubuntu African’s existential psychology is focused on belief, not reason. Rationality is overwhelmed by emotional identity to belong, and to conform, in order to improve the individual’s sense of self-worth, which is measured by his participation, not critical thinking.
The Descartian Western and Ubuntu African existential values which determine the individuals foundation for their sense of identity, purpose and meaning, are not slightly different; but opposing. If only slightly different, they could be compatible for a peaceful multi-cultural society. They are however in direct opposition to another; which means they are and will forever be in conflict with another; for supremacy. They are incompatible for a peaceful multi-cultural society. The former is capable of tolerating the latter, as it does for its less meta-cognitively aware cultural members; but the latter’s sense of personal identity shall continually be assaulted for not being ‘included’, aggravating his psychological insecurity. The psychologically insecure Ubuntu African’s response will be political and social coercion to ‘include’ to coerce society to ‘accept’ Africans ‘participation’, irrespective of their skills or competency to participate in any given skill, task or event.
The clash of these worldviews are further exacerbated in South Africa by a legal and political elite which pretend these existential identity differences don’t exist, in favour of manipulating the ignorant poverty stricken vote farm’s confusion, with apartheid blame game tactics for their own political gain.
3. Black Liberation Theology: Salvation/Liberation by Marxist Class Struggle, not Reconciliation/Forgiveness of Sins
In Black Liberation Theology Forgiveness and Reconciliation are achieved by means of a violent economic Marxist class struggle. In Calvinist Christianity Forgiveness and Reconciliation have absolutely nothing to do with economics or a violent class struggle, but are a result of a spiritual (i.e. inner self) emotional, intellectual and psychological process.
Black Liberation Theology believes that whites can only be forgiven once they have given up their belief in their whiteness and whiteness cultural values of merit, property rights, etc; and helped to violently overthrow whiteness to establish a Marxist Leninist communist utopia. Calvinist Christianity believes that anyone is forgiven when they take responsibility for their actions, sincerely apologize and a process of intellectual, emotional and psychological change sincerely occurs within both individuals. Forgiveness occurs when both reach a new understanding of the other persons point of view, and they transcend their enmity and anger over prior perceived insults or unjust actions with a determination to start their relationship on a clean slate. It’s a spritiual and psychological inner process of transcendence.
While the ANC’s ‘Truth and Reconciliation’ actions and conduct are founded on Black Liberation Theology doctrine, they have avoided clearly articulating what exactly they mean by Black Liberation Theology ‘forgiveness’ and ‘reconciliation’, to particularly the Conservative Christian public. If the ANC did honestly reveal their Black Liberation Theology violent Marxist ‘reconcilication’ doctrine definitions; it would result in Conservative, particularly Calvinist Christians being fully aware that ‘forgiveness’ and ‘reconciliation’ do not mean the same things to Boer/Afrikaners and ANC Black Liberation theology Marxists. Because they are opposing ideas about ‘reconciliation’, Calvinist ‘reconciliation’ is as impossible as Marxist ‘reconciliation’.
The TRC Political and Religious elite have exploited the African and European masses by avoiding clarifying these huge differences in meaning between the two camps, so as to benefit from the masses ignorance, and confusion, and scapegoat the Calvinist Christian community, whose ‘reconciliation’ perspectives are an impediment to ANC’s Black Liberation Theology ‘reconciliation’ aims to overthrow ‘whiteness’ and establish their communist utopia. In the absence of sufficiently precise legislation clarifying the meanings and definitions of these key concepts, citizens are unable to regulate their affairs with individuals from other cultures and religions in accordance with the rule of law.
Black Liberation Theology believes that whites can only be forgiven once they have given up their belief in their whiteness and whiteness cultural values of merit, property rights, etc; and helped to violently overthrow whiteness to establish a Marxist Leninist communist utopia. Calvinist Christianity believes that anyone is forgiven when they take responsibility for their actions, sincerely apologize and a process of intellectual, emotional and psychological change sincerely occurs within both individuals. Forgiveness occurs when both reach a new understanding of the other persons point of view, and they transcend their enmity and anger over prior perceived insults or unjust actions with a determination to start their relationship on a clean slate. It’s a spritiual and psychological inner process of transcendence.
While the ANC’s ‘Truth and Reconciliation’ actions and conduct are founded on Black Liberation Theology doctrine, they have avoided clearly articulating what exactly they mean by Black Liberation Theology ‘forgiveness’ and ‘reconciliation’, to particularly the Conservative Christian public. If the ANC did honestly reveal their Black Liberation Theology violent Marxist ‘reconcilication’ doctrine definitions; it would result in Conservative, particularly Calvinist Christians being fully aware that ‘forgiveness’ and ‘reconciliation’ do not mean the same things to Boer/Afrikaners and ANC Black Liberation theology Marxists. Because they are opposing ideas about ‘reconciliation’, Calvinist ‘reconciliation’ is as impossible as Marxist ‘reconciliation’.
The TRC Political and Religious elite have exploited the African and European masses by avoiding clarifying these huge differences in meaning between the two camps, so as to benefit from the masses ignorance, and confusion, and scapegoat the Calvinist Christian community, whose ‘reconciliation’ perspectives are an impediment to ANC’s Black Liberation Theology ‘reconciliation’ aims to overthrow ‘whiteness’ and establish their communist utopia. In the absence of sufficiently precise legislation clarifying the meanings and definitions of these key concepts, citizens are unable to regulate their affairs with individuals from other cultures and religions in accordance with the rule of law.
|
|
4. TRC Social Contract provides NO definitions for Multi-Cultural, Multi-Interpretation of Key Concepts of ‘Forgiveness’, ‘Reconciliation’, ‘Closure’ and ‘Ubuntu’:
In the TRC Report, Archbishop Tutu and the TRC Commissioners accuse Apartheid for having maintained legal oppression by means of vague definitions.
However in the exact same TRC Report (in fact in all TRC social contract legislation) there are NO definitions whatsoever for the Key Concepts of ‘Forgiveness’, ‘Reconciliation,’ ‘Closure’ and ‘Ubuntu’, which are socially, culturally, religiously, psychologically, and racially conflicting terms; which have multiple different meanings for different cultures, religions, etc.
So, if Apartheid maintained legal oppression by means of vague legal definitions, what kind of legal oppression (dictatorship?) are the ANC maintaining by means of NO LEGAL DEFINITIONS FOR KEY TRC SOCIAL CONTRACT LEGAL CONCEPTS?
Do the ANC want to deliberately create confusion, where citizens racial animosities are aggravated into enmity for the other, by establishing a legal framework where racial and conflicting cultures are unable to regulate their affairs with other cultures in accordance to the law, due to lack of clear legal definitions for key social contract concepts?
However in the exact same TRC Report (in fact in all TRC social contract legislation) there are NO definitions whatsoever for the Key Concepts of ‘Forgiveness’, ‘Reconciliation,’ ‘Closure’ and ‘Ubuntu’, which are socially, culturally, religiously, psychologically, and racially conflicting terms; which have multiple different meanings for different cultures, religions, etc.
So, if Apartheid maintained legal oppression by means of vague legal definitions, what kind of legal oppression (dictatorship?) are the ANC maintaining by means of NO LEGAL DEFINITIONS FOR KEY TRC SOCIAL CONTRACT LEGAL CONCEPTS?
Do the ANC want to deliberately create confusion, where citizens racial animosities are aggravated into enmity for the other, by establishing a legal framework where racial and conflicting cultures are unable to regulate their affairs with other cultures in accordance to the law, due to lack of clear legal definitions for key social contract concepts?
5. Was Truth and Reconciliation Seen to be Done, by the Ubuntu Black Liberation Theology Truth Commission?:
The answer by any impartial individual is an unequivocal NO.
For those unaware of the evidence, a good place to start would be (i) Anthea Jeffery’s The Truth About the Truth Commission, (ii) Generals Malan, Viljoen, Geldenhuys and Liebenberg’s Assessment of the probable results of the activities of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) as perceived by former Chiefs of the SADF IRO the SADF, and their additional Complaint filed with the Public Protector (which was simply ignored).
These raise so many issues of conflicts of interest, bias, omissions, censorship, etc. by the TRC, that it is no surprise how John Kane Berman, the Head of the SA Institute of Race Relations (SAIRR) concluded in the foreword to The Truth about the Truth Commission that:
“The commission also said that there could be no healing without truth, that half-truths and denial were no basis for building the new South Africa, that reconciliation based on falsehood would not last, and that selective recollection of past violence would easily provide the mobilisation for further conflict in the future. If these are its criteria for the role of truth in promoting reconciliation, it has failed to meet them.”
For those unaware of the evidence, a good place to start would be (i) Anthea Jeffery’s The Truth About the Truth Commission, (ii) Generals Malan, Viljoen, Geldenhuys and Liebenberg’s Assessment of the probable results of the activities of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) as perceived by former Chiefs of the SADF IRO the SADF, and their additional Complaint filed with the Public Protector (which was simply ignored).
These raise so many issues of conflicts of interest, bias, omissions, censorship, etc. by the TRC, that it is no surprise how John Kane Berman, the Head of the SA Institute of Race Relations (SAIRR) concluded in the foreword to The Truth about the Truth Commission that:
“The commission also said that there could be no healing without truth, that half-truths and denial were no basis for building the new South Africa, that reconciliation based on falsehood would not last, and that selective recollection of past violence would easily provide the mobilisation for further conflict in the future. If these are its criteria for the role of truth in promoting reconciliation, it has failed to meet them.”
[TRC Fraud: Just War Tradition] [TRC Fraud: Clash of Cultures Friction Theory]
[TRC Fraud: Population Policy Common Sense] [Volkstaat Secession or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return]
[TRC Fraud: Population Policy Common Sense] [Volkstaat Secession or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return]