Boer Volkstaat 10.31.16 Theses Briefing Paper: Executive Overview:
“An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it.” -– Mahatma Gandhi “We believe as much in the purity of race as we think they do, only we believe that they would best serve these interests, which are as dear to us as to them, by advocating the purity of all races, and not one alone.” - Mahatma Gandhi, Indian Opinion, 24 September 1903 “A man must first of all understand certain things. He has thousands of false ideas and false conceptions, chiefly about himself, and he must get rid of some of them before beginning to acquire anything new. Otherwise the new will be built on a wrong foundation and the result will be worse than before. To speak the truth is the most difficult thing in the world; one must study a great deal and for a long time in order to speak the truth. The wish alone is not enough. To speak the truth one must know what the truth is and what a lie is, and first of all in oneself. And this nobody wants to know.” -- G.I. Gurdjieff |
The purpose of this Boer Volkstaat 10/31/16 Theses Petition and Briefing Paper argument is that: [A] International and EU Political Recognition for VVK negotiations for a Boer Volkstaat in South Africa; or in the absence thereof [B] Jus Sanguinis Right of Return legislation by relevant EU nations, for their African White Refugee descendants, is fully justified as a result of: (I) International Law, (II) S. 235 of the SA Constitution and the Accord on Afrikaner Self-Determination, signed on 23 April 1994 between Freedom Front, African National Congress & SA Government; (III) African National Congress (ANC) and Anti-Apartheid Movement (AAM) Truth and Reconciliation (TRC) Fraud; and (IV) Population Policy Friction Theory Common Sense: The Peak Oil GeoPoLegal Military Necessity of Ethno-Cultural Secession and Economic Relocalisation. Put differently: the geopolitical, national, ethnic and cultural importance of amicably resolving the multi-cultural conflicts to occur as a result of population pressures colliding with declining resources, prior to their friction theory on steroids aggravation by the socio-political and economic friction theory resource war consequences of Peak Oil.
Limitations of space and concern for the readers patience do not provide the opportunity for this Petition and Briefing Paper to discuss every evidentiary argument and its political and legal nuance in support of the ‘TRC fraud’ thesis. Instead we focus on a few glaringly obvious ‘In Your Face’ Politically Incorrect TRC fraud Inconvenient Truths. These TRC Fraud Inconvenient Truths are deliberately ignored or censored by the Proudly South African Rainbow Hypocrisy worshipping academia and media, formerly known as the ‘Anti-Apartheid Movement’; or if you prefer democratic socialist publication Searchlight South Africa’s description of the Anti-Apartheid Movement: “the most successful Popular Front Lobby for Stalinism anywhere in the world.”
Limitations of space and concern for the readers patience do not provide the opportunity for this Petition and Briefing Paper to discuss every evidentiary argument and its political and legal nuance in support of the ‘TRC fraud’ thesis. Instead we focus on a few glaringly obvious ‘In Your Face’ Politically Incorrect TRC fraud Inconvenient Truths. These TRC Fraud Inconvenient Truths are deliberately ignored or censored by the Proudly South African Rainbow Hypocrisy worshipping academia and media, formerly known as the ‘Anti-Apartheid Movement’; or if you prefer democratic socialist publication Searchlight South Africa’s description of the Anti-Apartheid Movement: “the most successful Popular Front Lobby for Stalinism anywhere in the world.”
[TRC Fraud: Just War Tradition] [TRC Fraud: Clash of Cultures Friction Theory]
[TRC Fraud: Population Policy Common Sense] [Volkstaat Secession or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return]
[TRC Fraud: Population Policy Common Sense] [Volkstaat Secession or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return]
TRC Just War Fraud: Population Policy Common Sense:
Mandela and Tutu’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) negligently or deliberately ignored how Population Pressures and Black Power/African Ideal of Manhood Breeding War Policies were motives for establishing apartheid, and hugely aggravated political violence during Apartheid.
Firstly the fear of the ‘swart gevaar’ was a predominant motive for establishing Apartheid. Europeans were petrified of Euro-African national suicide: that Boer-Afrikaners would lose their identity and right to rule themselves as a result of being overwhelmed by the numerical superiority of black S. Africans.
Secondly, the ANC’s cultural and political breeding war created huge Youth Bulge Population Pressures deliberately aggravating Racial Conflict Resource War Political Violence, during Apartheid.
Firstly the fear of the ‘swart gevaar’ was a predominant motive for establishing Apartheid. Europeans were petrified of Euro-African national suicide: that Boer-Afrikaners would lose their identity and right to rule themselves as a result of being overwhelmed by the numerical superiority of black S. Africans.
Secondly, the ANC’s cultural and political breeding war created huge Youth Bulge Population Pressures deliberately aggravating Racial Conflict Resource War Political Violence, during Apartheid.
1. Population Policy Common Sense: Eco-Numeracy, Exponential Functions & Carrying Capacity, Youth Bulges Population Pressure Conflicts and Competitive Exclusion Principle:
Population Policies are the foundation of all other national and international political and social policies, as the point of population stabilisation is to reduce or minimize Malthusian misery. The absence of political and religious intervention in favour of population stabilisation is a consequence of those who prefer to financially or politically benefit from Malthuisian misery, starvation and resource war conflicts of overpopulation colliding with scarce resources. Naturally political, media and religious ‘leaders’ who reap political and religious social or financial benefits from Poverty Pimping, endorse the ANC’s abnormally sponsored population explosion of Malthusian poverty, moral degeneration and social disintegration.
In fact if the ANC had been sincere about liberating Black Africans out of their poverty and misery, Mandela et al could have avoided the armed liberation struggle and could simply have started a non-violent cultural campaign to educate Africans to change their procreation values: to value the importance of education for their children, the importance of avoiding procreating until married in a committed loving relationship; the importance of concentrating wealth by saving, the importance of small committed families, dedicated to nurturing their children. If more Africans adopted these value systems, they would be able to lift themselves out of poverty. Such a campaign would also have sent the Apartheid voters and government a strong message that Africans were starting to take personal responsibility for their families, for how they breed, for their children’s future, sending a clear message to Apartheid Politicians and voters that such Black Africans were worthy of national political suffrage reward for their acceptance of personal, familial and social responsibility.
Politicians and the media avoid educating the people about the importance of living in accordance to natures carrying capacity laws; the failure consequences being pestilence, war famine and death; or for example: the ‘Tragedy of the Common’s ‘social trap’ relationship between ‘Thou shalt not steal’ and ‘Thou shalt not breed’. The majority of citizens are totally ignorant that carrying capacity is an absolute necessity for honest bottom line ecological accounting. Citizens are clueless that a laissez faire birth control policy with no social welfare policies generally provides for a society in equilibrium to its carrying capacity; whereas a laissez faire birth control policy within a social welfare state results in runaway population growth, and ultimately in greater misery, poverty and resource wars. Citizens are ignorant that they should hold their political leaders ecologically accountable: legislators can have either a laissez fair birth control policy; or a social welfare state; but not both. If welfare policies are too precious to be abandoned, legislators must introduce limits to the right to breed, in order to avoid the misery, poverty and resource wars consequences of runaway population growth colliding with scarce or declining resources.
Other ecological carrying capacity issues dealt with are the Tragedy of the Commons, which effectively means that a limited finite world means a limited finite world of rights. Greater overpopulation and resource scarcity, results in less rights and more resource war violence. Resource war violence is aggravated by Youth bulges. Seventy to Ninety percent of all civil conflicts result in countries with large populations of idle young men: Youth Bulges. It concludes with Dr. T. Michael Maher’s study: How and Why Journalists Avoid the Population - Environment Connection.
In fact if the ANC had been sincere about liberating Black Africans out of their poverty and misery, Mandela et al could have avoided the armed liberation struggle and could simply have started a non-violent cultural campaign to educate Africans to change their procreation values: to value the importance of education for their children, the importance of avoiding procreating until married in a committed loving relationship; the importance of concentrating wealth by saving, the importance of small committed families, dedicated to nurturing their children. If more Africans adopted these value systems, they would be able to lift themselves out of poverty. Such a campaign would also have sent the Apartheid voters and government a strong message that Africans were starting to take personal responsibility for their families, for how they breed, for their children’s future, sending a clear message to Apartheid Politicians and voters that such Black Africans were worthy of national political suffrage reward for their acceptance of personal, familial and social responsibility.
Politicians and the media avoid educating the people about the importance of living in accordance to natures carrying capacity laws; the failure consequences being pestilence, war famine and death; or for example: the ‘Tragedy of the Common’s ‘social trap’ relationship between ‘Thou shalt not steal’ and ‘Thou shalt not breed’. The majority of citizens are totally ignorant that carrying capacity is an absolute necessity for honest bottom line ecological accounting. Citizens are clueless that a laissez faire birth control policy with no social welfare policies generally provides for a society in equilibrium to its carrying capacity; whereas a laissez faire birth control policy within a social welfare state results in runaway population growth, and ultimately in greater misery, poverty and resource wars. Citizens are ignorant that they should hold their political leaders ecologically accountable: legislators can have either a laissez fair birth control policy; or a social welfare state; but not both. If welfare policies are too precious to be abandoned, legislators must introduce limits to the right to breed, in order to avoid the misery, poverty and resource wars consequences of runaway population growth colliding with scarce or declining resources.
Other ecological carrying capacity issues dealt with are the Tragedy of the Commons, which effectively means that a limited finite world means a limited finite world of rights. Greater overpopulation and resource scarcity, results in less rights and more resource war violence. Resource war violence is aggravated by Youth bulges. Seventy to Ninety percent of all civil conflicts result in countries with large populations of idle young men: Youth Bulges. It concludes with Dr. T. Michael Maher’s study: How and Why Journalists Avoid the Population - Environment Connection.
|
|
2. Forsaking Commitment to Gandhian Non-violence, honour and character, the ANC-Fanonstein spawned a Government of comrade-tsotsis, gangsters & kleptomaniacs:
An examination of the motives for the establishment of Apartheid shows how Boer Politicians and citizens were petrified of the consequences of African cultural and political breeding wars: of “being overwhelmed by the numerical superiority of the blacks”.
They believed that only by establishing apartheid would white Africans be able to maintain their own identity and their right to rule themselves. The most fair, non-violent and benign geopolitical manner of self defence of European African community in South Africa, was to establish Apartheid. Verwoerd described the motives, practices and policies of apartheid as Separate Development, or Harmonious Multi-Community Development and Live and Let Live; established as a result of the fear of the ‘superiority of the Natives’.
Dr. Malan described Apartheid as a policy setting itself the task of preserving and safeguarding the racial identity of the white population, and likewise the black populations as separate racial groups; since the absence of apartheid would result in the national suicide of the whites. According to social geographer John Western in his book Outcast Capetown, the strategic political motives for establishing apartheid were the white national suicide fears about the ‘swart gevaar’ breeding war population explosion.
The motives for Apartheid were a direct result of the black African community’s cultural and political breeding war policies which overwhelmed and outnumbered whites. He compared Apartheid’s fears of the upper ruling classes of Britain when confronted with the population growth of the poor in Britain’s industrializing cities in the 1900’s. He concludes that the two strategic motives for establishing apartheid was the fear of the ‘swart gevaar’ and how white communities overwhelmed with black immigrants would aggravate racial conflict, and turn such communities into violent ghettos. To avoid this reality, white communities would need to be physically separated from black communities and blacks would need to be legally limited in their ability to enter white communities to maintain the safety and security of white communities.
Conclusion reached: Legislating Apartheid was a just cause for white survival, of ‘self defence’ right intention, a last resort; declared by proper authority, with reasonable chances of success, using proportional force. Consequently it was politically a Just War for Self Defence, in response to Black Africans cultural and political breeding war to establish black African hegemony.
They believed that only by establishing apartheid would white Africans be able to maintain their own identity and their right to rule themselves. The most fair, non-violent and benign geopolitical manner of self defence of European African community in South Africa, was to establish Apartheid. Verwoerd described the motives, practices and policies of apartheid as Separate Development, or Harmonious Multi-Community Development and Live and Let Live; established as a result of the fear of the ‘superiority of the Natives’.
Dr. Malan described Apartheid as a policy setting itself the task of preserving and safeguarding the racial identity of the white population, and likewise the black populations as separate racial groups; since the absence of apartheid would result in the national suicide of the whites. According to social geographer John Western in his book Outcast Capetown, the strategic political motives for establishing apartheid were the white national suicide fears about the ‘swart gevaar’ breeding war population explosion.
The motives for Apartheid were a direct result of the black African community’s cultural and political breeding war policies which overwhelmed and outnumbered whites. He compared Apartheid’s fears of the upper ruling classes of Britain when confronted with the population growth of the poor in Britain’s industrializing cities in the 1900’s. He concludes that the two strategic motives for establishing apartheid was the fear of the ‘swart gevaar’ and how white communities overwhelmed with black immigrants would aggravate racial conflict, and turn such communities into violent ghettos. To avoid this reality, white communities would need to be physically separated from black communities and blacks would need to be legally limited in their ability to enter white communities to maintain the safety and security of white communities.
Conclusion reached: Legislating Apartheid was a just cause for white survival, of ‘self defence’ right intention, a last resort; declared by proper authority, with reasonable chances of success, using proportional force. Consequently it was politically a Just War for Self Defence, in response to Black Africans cultural and political breeding war to establish black African hegemony.
3. Apartheid’s Strategic Demographic and Political Mistakes:
In The Lie of Apartheid and other True Stories from Southern Africa Arthur Kemp describes the strategic political and demographic mistakes made by Apartheid Political leaders.
These mistakes being the decisions to use cheap alien labour, which dispossessed them of their fatherland.
Cheap alien labour resulted in massive non-white exponential population growth, due to social welfare medical conditions provided to alien labour black populations, which hugely contributed to their population growth.
The consequent spiralling population pressures exacerbated racial friction theory safety and security problems.
Kemp argues that only by understanding the relationship between demographics and political power, by abandoning their dependence on non-white labour, and “accepting that their salvation lies in a smaller territory, congregating in such territory to form an outright demographic majority,” can Afrikaners be saved in Africa.
These mistakes being the decisions to use cheap alien labour, which dispossessed them of their fatherland.
Cheap alien labour resulted in massive non-white exponential population growth, due to social welfare medical conditions provided to alien labour black populations, which hugely contributed to their population growth.
The consequent spiralling population pressures exacerbated racial friction theory safety and security problems.
Kemp argues that only by understanding the relationship between demographics and political power, by abandoning their dependence on non-white labour, and “accepting that their salvation lies in a smaller territory, congregating in such territory to form an outright demographic majority,” can Afrikaners be saved in Africa.
4. Land Grabs and Farm Murders: A Rainbow-TRC-Peace, or Racial-Hatred-War Reality:
Dr. Philip du Toit’s expose in The Great SA Land Scandal, details that European and African perspectives towards farming and land management are totally contradictory. Each group perceives the other groups land management perspective as dysfunctional. While South Africans are informed they live in a Rainbow Democracy, Farm Murders have risen 3,095%, since 1994.
As detailed in the Radical Honesty SA Amicus Curiae to the Concourt, a comparison of the Farm Murder statistics that occurred during the declared wars known as the Mau Mau War in Kenya and the 15 year Rhodesian War, then the reality for farmers under the ANC Rainbow TRC government are not ‘peace’; but a full blown ‘race war’. This race war is obviously an opportunity for ANC Black Liberation Theologists to ‘liberate’ colonized minds, by providing them the opportunity to experience the cleansing force of violence on the rotting corpse of the settler.
Bluntly, Land Grabs and Farm Murders are not the result of any Rainbow-TRC-Peace, but of a Racial-Hatred-War Reality. It is a Racial-Hatred-War reality which both the ANC and the Anti-Apartheid TRC elite deliberately ignore, censor and suppress. According to State Prosecutors the level of violence, rape and torture that occurs during these farm murders are attributed to ‘racial hatred’. Racial hatred is not the result of ‘forgiveness’ or ‘reconciliation’ for Calvinist Christians; but it is what drives the Black Liberation Theologists concepts of reconciliation on the ‘rotting corpse of the settler’.
These diabolical opposing meanings for these key concepts must be confronted, including the reality that cultures whose foundational values are contradictory cannot hope to establish a peaceful multi-cultural society. You cannot follow the recipe for road-kill stew, and hope to end up with a crème brullee. It is scientifically, politically and legally impossible to create a peaceful multi-cultural society with cultures who have opposing values and beliefs.
As detailed in the Radical Honesty SA Amicus Curiae to the Concourt, a comparison of the Farm Murder statistics that occurred during the declared wars known as the Mau Mau War in Kenya and the 15 year Rhodesian War, then the reality for farmers under the ANC Rainbow TRC government are not ‘peace’; but a full blown ‘race war’. This race war is obviously an opportunity for ANC Black Liberation Theologists to ‘liberate’ colonized minds, by providing them the opportunity to experience the cleansing force of violence on the rotting corpse of the settler.
Bluntly, Land Grabs and Farm Murders are not the result of any Rainbow-TRC-Peace, but of a Racial-Hatred-War Reality. It is a Racial-Hatred-War reality which both the ANC and the Anti-Apartheid TRC elite deliberately ignore, censor and suppress. According to State Prosecutors the level of violence, rape and torture that occurs during these farm murders are attributed to ‘racial hatred’. Racial hatred is not the result of ‘forgiveness’ or ‘reconciliation’ for Calvinist Christians; but it is what drives the Black Liberation Theologists concepts of reconciliation on the ‘rotting corpse of the settler’.
These diabolical opposing meanings for these key concepts must be confronted, including the reality that cultures whose foundational values are contradictory cannot hope to establish a peaceful multi-cultural society. You cannot follow the recipe for road-kill stew, and hope to end up with a crème brullee. It is scientifically, politically and legally impossible to create a peaceful multi-cultural society with cultures who have opposing values and beliefs.
5. Masculine Insecurity Poverty Pimping: ANC’s population Production of Poverty and Violence Breeding War:
Black African culture does not value European culture’s values such as the importance of education, refraining from procreating any children until parents are in a committed loving relationship, concentrating family wealth by saving, to nurture children’s educational opportunities, etc. According to Robert McElvaine in Eve’s Seed: Masculine Insecurity, Metaphor and the Shaping of History, the primary causal factor of conquer and multiply slave and cannon fodder cultures is the religion of masculine insecurity.
Insecure masculinity is the result of men in psychological envy of women’s child bearing capabilities, because ‘only women bleed’. Examples of this ‘only women bleed’ insecurity are the practices of male circumcision to induce male bleeding, mimicking female menstruation. Other examples of masculine insecurity are men’s efforts to avoid a single standard for human behaviour and achievement, and how insecure men throughout history have setup ‘no woman’s lands’ in war, politics, clergy, business, men’s clubs, etc. McElvaine concludes that insecure men often seek validation of their manhood by pursuing power, and that masculine insecure leaders have had a hugely disproportionate influence on shaping their cultures and institutions to benefit and perpetuate insecure masculinity beliefs.
African males are particularly prone to masculine insecurity beliefs, as a result of their identities being a result of Ubuntu ‘I participate, therefore I am’ conformist identities. Whereas a Descartian males security would be a result of his critical thinking faculties and him knowing himself; the African males psychological security is not something he has any control over, it is a result of his chameleon like ability to conform. Examining the Anti-Apartheid Movement’s Poverty Pimping social and political policies, it is easy to conclude that it remains one of the most successful professional Poverty Pimp Political Organisations and Movements in the world. It continues to pretend to act as an intermediary on behalf of ‘liberating’ the black SA poor, disadvantaged and alleged ‘victimized’ groups, but it has no serious intentions whatsoever of addressing the root population policy causes of these groups socio-economic poverty or psycho-political ‘freedom/liberation’ babble ignorance.
In fact the ANC derives its political power from pimping ever more black Africans into poverty; i.e. from sustaining and in fact increasing its alleged disadvantaged and victimized political power base, while deflecting the blame for its poverty pimping Malthusian resource war consequences upon the proverbial scapegoat of ‘apartheid’. Succinctly: the ANC pimps its own people into poverty by its conscious and deliberate “abnormal government-sponsored population explosion of Malthusian poverty aggravation, moral degeneration and social disintegration.” The poor are a commodity to ANC politicians and Anti-Apartheid religious and political activists, from those with impressive Archbishop titles to the Poverty Pimping Professors who suck up the research grants to “support themselves and their cronies while they are studying, romanticizing or otherwise exploiting the [African] poor.”
Insecure masculinity is the result of men in psychological envy of women’s child bearing capabilities, because ‘only women bleed’. Examples of this ‘only women bleed’ insecurity are the practices of male circumcision to induce male bleeding, mimicking female menstruation. Other examples of masculine insecurity are men’s efforts to avoid a single standard for human behaviour and achievement, and how insecure men throughout history have setup ‘no woman’s lands’ in war, politics, clergy, business, men’s clubs, etc. McElvaine concludes that insecure men often seek validation of their manhood by pursuing power, and that masculine insecure leaders have had a hugely disproportionate influence on shaping their cultures and institutions to benefit and perpetuate insecure masculinity beliefs.
African males are particularly prone to masculine insecurity beliefs, as a result of their identities being a result of Ubuntu ‘I participate, therefore I am’ conformist identities. Whereas a Descartian males security would be a result of his critical thinking faculties and him knowing himself; the African males psychological security is not something he has any control over, it is a result of his chameleon like ability to conform. Examining the Anti-Apartheid Movement’s Poverty Pimping social and political policies, it is easy to conclude that it remains one of the most successful professional Poverty Pimp Political Organisations and Movements in the world. It continues to pretend to act as an intermediary on behalf of ‘liberating’ the black SA poor, disadvantaged and alleged ‘victimized’ groups, but it has no serious intentions whatsoever of addressing the root population policy causes of these groups socio-economic poverty or psycho-political ‘freedom/liberation’ babble ignorance.
In fact the ANC derives its political power from pimping ever more black Africans into poverty; i.e. from sustaining and in fact increasing its alleged disadvantaged and victimized political power base, while deflecting the blame for its poverty pimping Malthusian resource war consequences upon the proverbial scapegoat of ‘apartheid’. Succinctly: the ANC pimps its own people into poverty by its conscious and deliberate “abnormal government-sponsored population explosion of Malthusian poverty aggravation, moral degeneration and social disintegration.” The poor are a commodity to ANC politicians and Anti-Apartheid religious and political activists, from those with impressive Archbishop titles to the Poverty Pimping Professors who suck up the research grants to “support themselves and their cronies while they are studying, romanticizing or otherwise exploiting the [African] poor.”
6. Population Policy Common Sense Interpretation of Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation (TRC) Act, Amicus Curiae to Constitutional Court: CENSORED:
The Amicus is supported by expert witness statements from (i) Dr. Brad Blanton[1], founder of Radical Honesty, best selling author of Radical Honesty series of books, and former candidate for United States Congress from Virginia, in 2004 and 2006; as well as (ii) Dr. T. Michael Maher[2], Professor and Head of the Dept. of Communication at the University of Louisiana, since November 1974, author of the study: How and Why Journalists Avoid the Population-Environment Connection.
The South African political, legal and media elite decision to censor and suppress the information in the Radical Honesty SA Amicus before the Constitutional Court, from the SA public, has clearly and unequivocally demonstrated their political, legal and religious commitments. The SA TRC elite are not committed to honesty, truth, sincere forgiveness and reconciliation. They are not committed to addressing the root population policy and demographic causes for apartheid, and the current race war reality South Africans citizens live in. They are committed to perpetuating their political and social benefits from their TRC FRAUD PR PUBLICITY STUNT.
[1] Statement of Consent by Brad Blanton, Ph.D, to testify as expert witness to: Practicing Radical Honesty, Futilitarianism; i.e. Radical Honesty about Anger and Forgiveness; Paradigms and Contexts
[2] Statement of Consent by T. Michael Maher, Ph.D, to testify as expert witness to: How and Why Journalists Avoid the Population-Environment Connection and Media Framing and Salience of the Population Issue
The South African political, legal and media elite decision to censor and suppress the information in the Radical Honesty SA Amicus before the Constitutional Court, from the SA public, has clearly and unequivocally demonstrated their political, legal and religious commitments. The SA TRC elite are not committed to honesty, truth, sincere forgiveness and reconciliation. They are not committed to addressing the root population policy and demographic causes for apartheid, and the current race war reality South Africans citizens live in. They are committed to perpetuating their political and social benefits from their TRC FRAUD PR PUBLICITY STUNT.
[1] Statement of Consent by Brad Blanton, Ph.D, to testify as expert witness to: Practicing Radical Honesty, Futilitarianism; i.e. Radical Honesty about Anger and Forgiveness; Paradigms and Contexts
[2] Statement of Consent by T. Michael Maher, Ph.D, to testify as expert witness to: How and Why Journalists Avoid the Population-Environment Connection and Media Framing and Salience of the Population Issue
[TRC Fraud: Just War Tradition] [TRC Fraud: Clash of Cultures Friction Theory]
[TRC Fraud: Population Policy Common Sense] [Volkstaat Secession or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return]
[TRC Fraud: Population Policy Common Sense] [Volkstaat Secession or Jus Sanguinis Right of Return]